Friday, 13 May 2011 16:44

Fuzzy Logic: Spoilerific

Written by  Matt Dillon
Rate this item
(2 votes)

Fuzzy Logic: Or, How   To Get Ahead in Webzines. Maybe.

Matt Dillon. Not the one   you're hoping.Spoilerific

 "Oh my God! I can't believe Vader is Luke's DAD!!!1!"

Back in 1980 we didn't have the internet or social networking, so the closest we had to unsolicited spoilers of that magnitude - and despite the fading of time and over-familiarity, that one's a frickin' doozy - was an overzealous mate. If someone had told you the final plot twist as you were queuing for The Empire Strikes Back you'd have been pissed, and rightly so. Generally, however, this sort of thing was a rare occurrence, allowing us to enjoy our entertainment in peace, and in our own time.

These days, however, we live online and immerse ourselves in discussion boards, forums, newsgroups (actually, does anybody still use those?) and social networking sites. These tools and pastimes, usually a great way of keeping in touch with friends, family and like-minded individuals, become a minefield of potential misery each and every time popular entertainment produces an interesting plot twist, finale or competition result. These days, despite living in a world of video-on-demand and PVR devices, we actually have less choice of when and how we watch our entertainment. Our choice is harsh and distinctly unfair: watch our shows and movies, read our books and comics and play our video games immediately on release, or risk some hapless idiot ruining the surprise.

I'm not in a happy frame of mind right now. Last night, a friend spoiled the result of the Masterchef final for me by posting the result in their Facebook status, barely an hour after it had aired. I hadn't been able to watch it as broadcast because I was recording a podcast with the fair Gillian Coyle (who, incidentally, completely agreed with my resulting rantage). Now, I understand that there has to be a statute of limitations on these things, but ONE HOUR? It's the sort of situation that the term "apoplectic" was invented for*. Now, I know what some of you are thinking. Why don't I just unplug from the net (or simply avoid social networking sites) until I've caught up on these things? My friend's partner said as much to me when I complained. My retort is simple: I shouldn't have to.

The infamous Web 2.0 isn't exactly in its infancy any more. We should be used to this level of public interaction. Newsgroups are older than Methos**. Forums and posting boards have been around for almost two decades. Social networking too, if you count applications like ICQ and Windows Live Messenger. Facebook just celebrated its seventh birthday, and Twitter is almost two and a half. We've had plenty of time to get used to the glare of this shiny new method of connecting with our peers - more than enough for us to get used to the fact that these days, when we shout people hear. Our thoughts and innermost feelings, casually typed into that inviting little box in our web browser or client app, are instantly transmitted without filter to everybody we know - which means that when you carelessly reveal just how amazed you are at how the Doctor got out of last week's cliffhanger, you potentially become Homer Simpson, walking out of Empire and ruining the experience for everyone queuing. You, frankly, are a prick.

Point one: why should I have to unplug myself from the net because you can't control yourself? The internet is now so ingrained as a part of our lives that cutting yourself off really is a wrench, and if, for the purposes of this argument, we're really sticking the responsibility of staying spoiler-free with the spoiled rather than the spoil-monger, there really are too many ways in which the Internet can ruin your day: email, Skype status messages, RSS feeds, home pages, news sites, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, web-comics, bylines... each one is a potential minefield of unwanted and unsolicited information. Frankly, it's an impractical suggestion, not to mention glib and near-sighted.

Point two: why should I be forced to consume my media to your timescale rather than mine? To avoid unnecessary irritation? A proposition that's as unfair as it is ridiculous. It's like renting a DVD only to find yourself followed home by an overenthusiastic Blockbuster employee who stands in your living room muttering "Have you watched it yet? Have you watched it yet?" over and over. Again, we live in a world of iPlayer, and of scheduled digital recording devices like TiVo, Sky+ and PlayTV. People use these devices to plan their television viewing around their lives, not the other way around - and more people make use of them than don't.

Point three: why should the first order of business upon joining a digital community be to throw social convention and etiquette out of the window? Consider this analogy: if Facebook is your workplace, then a direct message (DM) is a confidential conversation held in an empty office, posting directly on somebody else's wall is a conversation with a colleague conducted in a public area, and posting a status update is talking loudly over open-plan cubicles. Option one is imparting information directly and privately, option two is doing so directly but where people might overhear and option three is ensuring that as many people as possible hear what you have to say. With this in mind, how would you react to someone who walked in and very deliberately bellowed the ending to a movie you were looking forward to, or the final score in the football match you were hoping to catch on replay after work?

Online communication and social network are now fairly well integrated into our culture. It's time that we started employing the same checks and balances on our behaviour online as we do in person. Forget netiquette - install etiquette! Perhaps if we all did that the Internet would become a far less frustrating place all round.


*Yes, pedants, I was so angry that I almost had a stroke. Seriously, ask Gillian.

**Who could take two of everything Methuselah could and go for a jog afterwards.


Matt Dillon

Matt Dillon

The creator, Publisher, webmaster, cartoonist and first ever Podcaster of GeekPlanetOnline. So there. When he's not busy tinkering with the site, recording or editing a podcast, Matt can be found catching up with a TV show that he's got into three years after everybody else or pissing his life away playing videogames. He's rubbish at them, but he plays them anyway.

Matt got his first taste of journalism writing for Sci-Fi London between 2007 - 2008. Since then he has written freelance for SFX Magazine, drawn more cartoons than is healthy and embarked upon writing a series of novellas, some of which actual human beings have actually read. He lives in West Sussex with several goldfish and a ridiculously large collection of movies and retro games consoles. He was officially sorted into Hufflepuff house in 2012.



  • Comment Link Gillian Coyle Saturday, 14 May 2011 09:10 posted by Gillian Coyle

    I see where you're coming from Billy, but I'm with Matt in general. Most people do have consideration for others and don't blurt out spoilers (be it for sport, reality shows or dramas) in status updates. They may discuss them in the thread resulting from a status update, and though the risk of spoilage from those threads is still there, it's far more easily avoided.

    There have always been inconsiderate or thoughtless people who will blurt things out though, even people who think it's funny to do so (such as the guy who told me the twist to The Sixth Sense as I was putting on my coat to go to the cinema to watch it), but in meat space it's much easier to avoid them or shut them up.

    No one is saying you shouldn't be able to discuss things, just that you can show some consideration for others when doing so. For example, in the Masterchef example above, posting "Very happy with the Masterchef result. Good stuff!" or similar allows you to discuss it without ruining the enjoyment of other people. People who've seen it know what you mean, people who haven't can watch it themselves. It takes very little effort and then everyone's happy.

  • Comment Link Billy Abbott Saturday, 14 May 2011 07:33 posted by Billy Abbott

    I take a slightly different view - why should people curtail their social interactions based on your viewing schedule?

    The days of everyone watching something at the same time are on their way out, but the days of the internet as the prime turf for discussion of 'things' are rising. For many people their main conversations about something like Masterchef will be through something like Facebook, with those conversations initiated through a public post, asking those who are interested to join in. In almost the same way that you are saying "You are ruining my enjoyment of X" they could come back with a "You are ruining my enjoyment of discussing X" if they subscribe to your rules of etiquette.

    It's a difficult problem and one that used to have a solution - fora specifically for discussion of things that might be 'spoilery', aka Forums. Now that we are moving to the public conversation rather than closed ones (Twitter and FB are all about publishing to the world, in the main) as default, with a small number of conversation locations rather than the pile of forums that used to be around I agree we need to work out ways of being nice, but doing so without getting in the way of each other's uses of the net as a communication tool is Hard.

    Basically - I've given up and just read plot synopses on Wikipedia these days...

    Oh and Tom: A twist in Dexter season 1? Knowing that's ruined it for me. You could have at least put a spoiler warning on your comment... :)

  • Comment Link Tom Elliot Friday, 13 May 2011 18:50 posted by Tom Elliot

    BTW, I'd still watch Dexter if you get the chance. The twist in Season 1 might have been ruined for you, but the other seasons are great too.

  • Comment Link Tom Elliot Friday, 13 May 2011 18:50 posted by Tom Elliot

    BTW, I'd still watch Dexter if you get the chance. The twist in Season 1 might have been ruined for you, but the other seasons are great too.

  • Comment Link Mike & Ike Friday, 13 May 2011 18:20 posted by Mike & Ike

    We read on some other site ya were gonna do this.

Login to post comments

Support Us On Patreon!

Support GeekPlanetOnline on Patreon!


Publisher & Webmaster
Matt Dillon

Dave Probert

Copy Editor
Gillian Coyle

Book Correspondent
Verity Hayter

Horror Correspondent
Jim Moon

Doctor Who Correspondent
Martin Thompson

US Correspondent
NyQ Bonaventura